- We Study Markets
- Posts
- šļø Stablecoin IPO
šļø Stablecoin IPO
[5 minutes to read] Plus: Why aren't companies spending on AI?
By Matthew Gutierrez and Shawn OāMalley
Ready or not, welcome to Q4 earnings season, folks.
The Big Banks kicked things off, with JPMorgan registering the most profitable year in U.S. banking history.
Citigroup delivered less positive news, promising to cut some 20,000 jobs. And Bank of Americaās earnings fell short of expectations, reporting a 50% decline in net income from a year ago.
š Today was just a first taste of the many corporate insights weāll sift through in the coming weeks.
ā Matthew & Shawn
Hereās todayās rundown:
Today, we'll discuss the three biggest stories in markets:
Major stablecoin company attempts IPO for second time
Why isnāt the AI boom spurring more corporate investment?
Goldmanās CEO warns of mounting geopolitical shockwaves
All this, and more, in just 5 minutes to read.
POP QUIZ
In The News
š Stablecoin Company Takes Second Attempt at IPO
Talk of bitcoin ETFs is all the rage, but bitcoin isnāt the only digital asset going mainstream. Circle Internet Financial (aka āCircleā), operator of the popular USDC stablecoin, filed paperwork this week for an initial public offering (IPO) ā its second attempt in roughly a year.
Unlike other blockchain-based assets like bitcoin and ethereum, stablecoins donāt swing in value, at least theyāre not supposed to. Fitting the name, theyāre intended to beā¦stable.
These tokens are frequently pegged to major currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, and 1 token usually equals $1.
What to know: The concept resembles digital, blockchain-based money market funds. But not all stablecoins are structured the same, and the companies who manage and offer them arenāt created equally.
Some are much closer to deserving the title ādigital money market fundsā than others. (Read a Fed study on this here.)
Circle probably falls closer to the deserving category ā widely considered a respectable stablecoin operator, playing by regulatorsā rules and generally operating transparently.
How it works: Like money market funds, stablecoin companies take in customer deposits and purchase assets, like U.S. Treasury bonds. That backstops their stablecoinās value and provides interest income to fund operations.
Stablecoin transactions can settle much faster than regular banking-system transactions and offer wider access to major currencies.
For example, pretty much anyone, anywhere in the world could buy a U.S. dollar stablecoin to save or transact with. This enables people to effectively use dollars, regardless of whether they have a U.S. bank account.
Why it matters:
Easy, low-cost access to stable, major currencies is a historical anomaly for most. Often in emerging market countries, people are forced to use their countryās more volatile local currency, leaving them vulnerable to higher inflation rates.
Stablecoinsā proliferation has actually created a major new buyer of U.S. Treasury bonds, helping keep the worldās most important financial market liquid.
Tether, the worldās largest stablecoin, is now a top buyer of U.S. Treasury bunds, holding more U.S. debt than entire countries and helping fund government spending deficits.
Back to Circle: Based in Boston, Circle hopes to grow its market share in the stablecoin biz ā an IPO would help raise the funds necessary for expansion.
With over $25 billion worth of tokens in circulation, an IPO approval would be a considerable regulatory endorsement of Circleās legitimacy, compared to Tether, which has faced controversy for its offshore ties and lack of transparency.
Circle did take a big hit last year after revealing it held $3 billion in the now-failed Silicon Valley Bank, causing its stablecoin to temporarily āde-pegā and fall to 88 cents on the dollar in trading.
Months later, Coinbase affirmed its faith in Circle by purchasing a minority stake.
Watch more (how stablecoins can help the greenback)
Together With Decipad
See Their New AI Assistant In Action!
Remember Decipad? We spoke with their founder a few weeks ago, and we're thrilled to announce a preview of their latest groundbreaking addition ā a brand-new AI Assistant!
What can the AI Assistant do?
Decipadās AI Assistant is currently optimized to get you started with new Decipad documents, so you can get up and running in just a minute. They went all out and built a real assistant, a collaborator who works and builds with you.
Feedback is gold: Your experiences, bug reports, and suggestions are crucial. While the AI Assistant isnāt perfect at this point, it shows immense potential. With your help, Decipad can refine it to excellence.
New Year Gift!
And since we're so amped for you to experience Decipadās AI, we're throwing in a gift of 100 free credits in January for you to play with!
We can't wait to see what you think!
š¤ Is the AI Boom Real?
Weāve all heard about the AI boom and its expected but profoundly unknown changes to our economy, yielding huge potential gains in productivity.
Of course, epic economic transformations donāt just happen without the proper infrastructure.
Put the pieces in place: The automobile was a captivating development, but cars didnāt have a wide economic impact until we could a) produce them at scale and b) leverage their efficiencies with interstate highway systems.
The same was true with the internet in the 1990s ā corporate investment rates surged, increasing by 3% of GDP, as companies raced to update their systems.
So, with a āboomā in AI seemingly already unfolding, surely we can see the fingerprints of companiesā investments in this transformative technology, correct?
Apparently not. Instead, businessesā capital expenditures (ācapexā) ā the amount spent on fixed assets ā have been āremarkably weak,ā according to The Economist.
While capex recovered after pandemic lockdowns were lifted, particularly as companies hurried to shore up decimated supply chains, business expenditures slowed again.
Why it matters:
Surely, some of this is cyclical, especially with interest rates rising in 2022 & 2023, but capex broadly has remained muted.
Familiar names like Microsoft, Nvidia, and Meta ā really any ābig techā company ā have ramped up spending on research and development, engineering resources, and computing power.
Microsoftās total spending is expected to swell 20% this year.
What about everybody else? The Economist calculates that by excluding the firms ādriving the AI revolution,ā capex growth for other S&P 500 companies is modestly in line with inflation, forecasted to increase by 2.5% in 2024.
And according to OECD data for major economies, corporate investment spending in the back half of 2023 was slower than typical pre-pandemic rates.
Mixed signals: The question, then, for firms driving the AI revolution is whether corporations worldwide will spend royal sums on the very expensive-to-build tools theyāre creating.
If not, or if not yet, it wouldnāt be the first time technologists overstated market demand for breakthroughs. Even the internet took decades to integrate and fundamentally transform society, and the 90s-era enthusiasm for all things internet culminated in the massive ādot comā bubble.
They werenāt necessarily wrong, but they were early, and in finance, early might as well be wrong.
Perhaps the issue is still timing, and we remain a few years away from feeling AIās influence.
A Goldman Sachs survey of top executives found that only 5% think AI will have a āsignificant impactā in the next one to two years, but 65% foresee its impact within three to five years.
More Headlines
šØ New York and California to make addressing retail theft priorities in 2024
š Can Denmarkās world-leading drug maker stay ahead?
š„ High Noon hard seltzers are Americaās best-selling spirit
šļø New Yorkās last Sears is closing, and just over a dozen remain nationwide
š Hertz is selling 20,000 EVs and replacing them with gas cars
šø BlackRock buys Global Infrastructure Partners for $12 billion
š Geopolitical Issues are Increasingly Disrupting the Global Economy
If you feel like the world seems a little less stable these days, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon agrees with you.
Mounting geopolitical shockwaves born out of growing competition between powers has spurred investors to pay closer attention to great-power politics.
Said Solomon, āEverywhere I go, people want to talk geopolitics. Thatās not been the case for most of my career.ā
Adding, āWeāre now going through a period of time where the impact of geopolitical events is going to have a broader impact on economic growth and capital flows around the world.ā
Some context: The end of the Cold War ushered in a new era of globalization, with relative calm allowing countries to form deeper trade relationships, outsource supply chains, open their financial markets to the rest of the world, and so on, prioritizing economic efficiency.
Covid-19, Russiaās invasion of Ukraine, a destabilizing Middle East, and competition between the U.S. and China have pushed companies, investors, and governments alike to reassess risk-return tradeoffs globally, particularly decisions optimizing for efficiency over security.
Why it matters:
Business and governmental leaders are rethinking supply chains. Says Solomon, āYou need to think strategically, not just a profit motive. Itās about strategic positioning.ā
For Goldman, India is a growing focus. Its offices in Bengaluru are āgetting awfully close to being bigger than New York.ā
Nearly half of the bankās employees are based outside the U.S., but Solomon emphasized, āWe certainly are U.S., first and foremost.ā
Hosting six of the worldās leading financial institutions is a āgreat asset for the U.S.,ā he says.
Itās not just Solomon; Merrill Lynchās chief investment officer commented recently, āGeopolitics used to be considered a lower-level financial risk. Now, it may be the top risk.ā
Quick Poll
Do you think your company is doing enough to embrace AI?(Leave a comment to clarify your answer!) |
Yesterday, we asked: Will you allocate any portion of your brokerage or retirement account to bitcoin ETFs?
ā Said one No voter, āI will own the asset itself and custody it myself with all the carnage over the last few years. This is a good step for most, but self-custody is important to me and was a big premise in the creation of BTC.ā
ā Said another, āMuch too speculative asset class for my taste, I wouldn't bet my retirement on it.ā
ā A Yes voter commented, āBoth!ā
TRIVIA ANSWER
See you next time!
That's it for today on We Study Markets!
Enjoy reading this newsletter? Forward it to a friend.
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.
Use the promo code STOCKS15 at checkout for 15% off our popular course āHow To Get Started With Stocks.ā
Partner with us.
Follow us on Twitter.
Keep an eye on your inbox for our newsletters on weekdays around 6pm EST and on weekends. If you have any feedback for us, simply respond to this email.
You can also leave your comments/suggestions/feedback anonymously here.
What did you think of today's newsletter? |
All the best,
P.S. The Investor's Podcast Network is excited to launch a subreddit devoted to our fans in discussing financial markets, stock picks, questions for our hosts, and much more!
Join our subreddit r/TheInvestorsPodcast today!
Ā© The Investor's Podcast Network content is for educational purposes only. The calculators, videos, recommendations, and general investment ideas are not to be actioned with real money. Contact a professional and certified financial advisor before making any financial decisions. No one at The Investor's Podcast Network are professional money managers or financial advisors. The Investorās Podcast Network and parent companies that own The Investorās Podcast Network are not responsible for financial decisions made from using the materials provided in this email or on the website.